ML Archiv: Re: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5

Subject:	Re: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5
From:	"C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 6 Dec 2001 21:24:31 +0800

Subject:

Re: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5

From:

Date:

Thu, 6 Dec 2001 21:24:31 +0800

Grath,

Well! you got some really nice shots! I especially like this one:

http://www.taiga.ca/~gallery/subpages/wood/cavell01.html

The quality of the chrome seems to be better then the scan from negative,
was it due to the scanner?

C.H.Ling

----- Original Message -----
From: "Garth Wood" <garth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>
> I've got some pics of Minnewanka, as well as many of the Canadian
> Rockies.  Here's a few Rockies shots:
>
> http://www.taiga.ca/~gallery/subpages/wood/karen01.html
> http://www.taiga.ca/~gallery/subpages/wood/athabasca01.html
> http://www.taiga.ca/~gallery/subpages/wood/cavell01.html
> http://www.taiga.ca/~gallery/subpages/wood/pinnacle.html
> http://www.taiga.ca/~gallery/subpages/wood/robson.html
> http://www.taiga.ca/~gallery/subpages/wood/rockwash.html
>
>
> Hmmm.  Time to post some more.
>
> Garth
>



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, (continued) Re: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Steve Goss Re: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, John A. Lind Re: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Mike Re: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Skip Williams Re: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, andrew fildes Re: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Barry B. Bean RE: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Daniel J. Mitchell RE: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, James N. McBride RE: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Brian Swale RE: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Garth Wood Re: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, C.H.Ling <= Re: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Garth Wood RE: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Daniel J. Mitchell Re: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Skip Williams Re: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, andrew fildes RE: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Daniel J. Mitchell Re: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Mike Re: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Jim Couch RE: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Timpe, Jim RE: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Garth Wood RE: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Daniel J. Mitchell

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] G-40 manual, Hans van Veluwen
Next by Date:	RE: [OM] G-40 manual, Alan Wood
Previous by Thread:	RE: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Garth Wood
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Garth Wood
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]