Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5

Subject: Re: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5
From: andrew fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 16:14:58 +1100
>The biggest issue with the Ultra Wide Angle lenses, especially the
>rectilinear ones, is that you've GOT to keep them level.  There's so much
>horizon it's very easy to get it off a little.  And it shows up quickly with
>that large FOV.

And, with architectural work like interiors, dead centre too. I've got one
shot where I was level but perhaps one foot off centre in a scene with
tiled floor and ceiling and two foreground pillars. Unusable.


>FOV is almost identical for the same focal length across manufacturers.

Unless they are lying about the focal length - some cheat a bit!


>P.S. If I really need wide, I have a 14mm/4.5 Voigtlander.  And I could get
>a 12/5.6!  But it's not as easy to do UWA's with a rangefinder.
>Skip

You mean the 15mm Heliar? Great little object!
AndrewF
(Also lusting after the 12mm. Tried the 21mm Skopar yet? Razor sharp!)




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz