ML Archiv: RE: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5

Olympus-OM

RE: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5

from Garth Wood

Subject:	RE: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5
From:	Garth Wood <garth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 06 Dec 2001 18:51:33 -0700

At 01:48 PM 06/12/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>http://www.dwave.net/~tony/Shuksan/shuksan.htm
>
>for those unfamiliar with said Mt.

Now, *those* are nice photos.  ;-)

Garth


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, (continued) RE: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Garth Wood Re: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Garth Wood RE: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Daniel J. Mitchell Re: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Skip Williams Re: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, andrew fildes RE: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Daniel J. Mitchell Re: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Mike Re: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Jim Couch RE: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Timpe, Jim RE: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Garth Wood <= RE: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Daniel J. Mitchell

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Scanning quality, Richard F. Man
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Re-introduction, Garth Wood
Previous by Thread:	RE: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Timpe, Jim
Next by Thread:	RE: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Daniel J. Mitchell
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]