ML Archive: Re: [OM] 16/3.5

Subject:	Re: [OM] 16/3.5
From:	"Gary Edwards" <garyetx@xxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 2 Nov 2001 06:29:38 -0600

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeffrey R. Keller" <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Maybe I really need a 16 ...
> -jeff

Why, of course!


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Lens sharpness, (continued) Re: [OM] Lens sharpness, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] Lens sharpness, Tom Scales Re: [OM] Lens sharpness, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] Lens sharpness, Jeffrey R. Keller Re: [OM] Lens sharpness, Tom Scales Re: [OM] Lens sharpness, Tom Scales [OM] 16/3.5, Jeffrey R. Keller Re: [OM] 16/3.5, Tom Scales Re: [OM] 16/3.5, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] 16/3.5, Jeffrey R. Keller Re: [OM] 16/3.5, Gary Edwards <= RE: [OM] 16/3.5, gries Re: [OM] 16/3.5, Jeffrey R. Keller Re: [OM] 16/3.5, W.Xato [OM] Oly users in rotating gallery, andrew fildes Re: [OM] 16/3.5, Gary Edwards Re: [OM] 16/3.5, W.Xato Re: [OM] 16/3.5, ll . clark Re: [OM] 16/3.5, Jeffrey R. Keller Re: [OM] 16/3.5, Henrik Dahl Re: [OM] 16/3.5, W.Xato

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Problem with OM-40 or me ?!?, Thomas Bryhn
Next by Date:	Re: RE:[OM] A sack of shot redux, Walt Wayman
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] 16/3.5, Jeffrey R. Keller
Next by Thread:	RE: [OM] 16/3.5, gries
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] 16/3.5