I would go with an f3 as it is the camera that seem
(to me at least) that it looks a lot like an Olympus
in features and shape. The new top of the line Canons
just look kinda ridiculous features wise, and they are
sooo plasticky. Plasticky lenses too. of course I'm
biased agains Canon when I tried one out a couple of
yoears ago, I hated it. And the newest top of the
line Nikon, The F5, is just ugly to my eyes. So if I
had to go with something else I'd choose Nikon MF
cause the older Nikon lenses are really nice.
Mark Lloyd
--- Nick Taylor <ntaylor@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Clemente Colayco wrote:
> >
> > If you were just for a moment to think of
> replacing your OM camera bodies
> > with a Nikon wonderbrik, what would it be? Would a
> new FM 3a or F90x (N90n)
> > be a good one? Rather amongst all the Nikons what
> would you get?
>
> If I were to buy a N*k*n it would be a Canon!
> Excellent bodies and
> lenses ... consumer, prosumer, and pro. The body
> for you depends
> on your needs (and desires). The image stabilized
> 28-135mm zoom is
> an excellent choice for a first lens. The Canon
> line may not have
> the "snob appeal" of a N*k*n, but ....
>
> Regards,
> -Nick T.
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing
> List >
> < For questions,
> mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page:
> http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|