| Subject: | Re: [OM] Three day, three post rule |
|---|---|
| From: | "Barry B. Bean" <bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Sep 2001 15:40:52 -0500 (CDT) |
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001 22:36:32 -0700 (PDT), Ken N wrote: >Why don't we institute a three day, three post rule on ANY and >ALL subjects. Because the law of unintended consequences will strike like a lightning bolt. - B.B. Bean bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Bean & Bean Cotton Co http://www.beancotton.com Peach Orchard, MO < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] RE: [OT] My LAST Farewell from one of the BIGGER enablers, Motor Sport Visions Photography |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Alternatives to the Eveready Case?, Doggre |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Three day, three post rule, Jim Couch |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Three day, three post rule, Acer V |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |