| Subject: | Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT! |
|---|---|
| From: | DaEyeGuy@xxxxxxx |
| Date: | Sun, 16 Sep 2001 08:29:02 EDT |
in my records I have a writen timeline of my own from my old magazines, etc, and I have written down that both the T-32 and the Om2n were issued in 1979, vs. 1975 for the OM2. Susan Steele Virginia USA The best way to forget all your troubles is to wear tight shoes. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Tom Scales |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, DaEyeGuy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Charles Loeven |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Tom Scales |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |