Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Your opinion on 35-70's

Subject: Re: [OM] Your opinion on 35-70's
From: Bernd Möller <dsl33687a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 08:28:28 +0200
Hi,

> Or maybe borrow a 35-80/2.8 for a while and the 3.6 will seem so 
> light and compact. :-)

I think so, yes. But do you think there is someone who will borrow me a 
38-80/2.8? (Anybody here? ;-)

> Seriously.  The 3.6 size and weight are greatly exaggerated. It is 
> bigger than the 3.5-4.5 but it is 150 grams lighter and 3 mm longer 
> than the 90/2  which some people love to carry around.  It is lighter 
> than the 100/2, any of the long zooms or long telephotos. Many people 
> think that 3.6 photos have a special "look" to them which is really 
> nice.

Now that's an interesting point. Do other list members have made experiences 
with this special "look"?

Regards,

Bernd



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz