Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Olympus Parts Supply

Subject: Re: [OM] Olympus Parts Supply
From: Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 15:27:33 -0800
Perhaps Olympus OM equipment has been out of production much
longer than we thought. It's been my belief that all the new OM stuff
being sold is what is actually "new old stock". That being the case,
of course there are no more parts. It hasn't been manufactured for
quite a few years.

I need to go think more about it now.

geo2


On 11 Feb 2001, at 16:06, Mark Dapoz wrote:

Date sent:      Sun, 11 Feb 2001 16:06:08 -0500 (EST)
From:           Mark Dapoz <md@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:             olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:        Re: [OM] Olympus Parts Supply
Send reply to:  olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, John Prosper wrote:

 > >From: Gary Reese <pcacala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 > >
 > >It's 7 years, but there is a catch.  It doesn't cover accessories!
 >
 > Aren't glass elements in a lens considered part of the lens proper,
 > part of the main unit, rather than a mere accessory?  It seems to me
 > that accessories are optional extras, not integral parts of the main
 > product.

 You haven't dealt with the Olympus parts department have you? :-)  All
 this 7 year parts supply is great in theory, but in reality it doesn't
 work that way, at least not for Olympus.  In my latest attempt at
 getting parts, I tried getting a part for the 35/shift, which last
 time I checked is still being sold by Olympus.  Despite that fact,
 their on-line inventory system claims the parts are discontinued.  The
 parts department manager has been trying to get parts for me directly
 from Japan for 3 months.  Still no luck. I thik we've got a lot less
 than 7 years to go before no new replacement parts are available.
 >     -mark



It is interesting that during the production of unlamented M5, Leica offered a few thousand M4s assembled from the spare parts inventory. There was such a demand for the older model that the very successful M6, which was essentially an M4 with a meter, was created. It does not look like Olympus could do that. But then, again, Olympus has not created a dreadful mistake like the M5.

Winsor
--
Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California, USA
mailto:wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz