Yes, the idea is that even if the lens was going for $100, and you already own
the better 50mm f1.2, let someone on the list benefit as they might actually
NEED it, and can only afford the lower price. Obviously that wouldn't have
happened. It would've been snapped up right there at that price & sold right
smack up to the typical unaffordable usual selling price.
Larry
Chip Stratton wrote:
> So you already have a nice 50/1.2 and here you are thinking you would buy a
> 55/1.2 at the local shop, except that it is 'a little higher than I wanted
> to spend'.
>
> And I thought you were finally getting a handle on your disease! Maybe you
> want it for those shots where you need to be a about 10 0.000000urther away
> from
> the subject, with a hair less contrast to boot?
>
> Of course, I will prescribe the standard therapy and have you ship your
> 50/1.2 to me immediately, so you can go out and get that 55/1.2 without any
> guilt.
>
> Chip Stratton
> cstrat@xxxxxxxxx
>
> > I was in a local shop today and they have a pristine 55 f/1.2 Zuiko. They
> > wanted $240 for it. It's a little higher than I wanted so spend, since I
> > have the 50/1.2, but I thought I'd mention it to the list. If you're
> > interested, write me offline and I'll hook you up.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Tom
> >
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|