I agree with Giles.
I think the both the 4Ti and 3Ti are overpriced. But for a practical purposes,
the 4Ti is more reasonable to me. I don't think the full mechanical shutter
and added hand grip is worth to my usage and money, IMHO, and I would
get the 4Ti. BTW, this discussion at omfan.com in Japan was also discussed
and many people in this group, as I recall, favored the 4Ti over the 3Ti.
Jim Terazawa
Giles wrote:
> The OM-4Ti. It will do pretty much everything the OM-3Ti will do and
> more.
>
> If you are going to use your camera in sub zero temperatures a lot then
> perhaps the OM3-Ti would be better, except the batteries will cease to
> function, so you lose the meter functions and you might as well have had
> an OM1 for a lot fewer $.
>
> An OM4-Ti with the external battery pack thingie - Battery holder II? -
> would be cheaper than an Om3-Ti and would perform better in sub-zero
> temperatures.
>
> Do you experience sub-zero temperatures in Brazil very often ;-)
>
> I recall that Michael Covington also thought the OM4-Ti a better camera
> than the OM3-Ti.
>
> The OM3-Ti might hold it's value better.
>
> Giles
>
> Toni Campos wrote:
>
> > I'd like to know how is the better camera, if the OM-4Ti or the OM-3Ti.
> > I'm going to purchase any of this ones, so any advice about will be well
> > received.
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|