Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Least Useful/Used Oly Piece

Subject: Re: [OM] Least Useful/Used Oly Piece
From: "Gary Edwards" <garyetx@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 07:33:09 -0500
Oh Winsor, I am so happy to finally learn that I'm not alone!  I can't tell
the difference with my 2-13 either.  No you can't have it, Barry.

Gary Edwards


----- Original Message -----
From: Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 3:26 PM
Subject: [OM] Least Useful/Used Oly Piece


> We all know the list favorites. You know, the 90mm macro, the 50mm F2
> macro, the 350mm F2.8, etc. I was wondering:
>
> 1. Is there an Oly lens or accessory that you wonder why you bought
> it because it is not that great?  That is, not that great.
>
> 2. Is there an Oly lens or accessory that is just fine, but you find
> that you just don't use it. That is, just done use it much.
>
> My nomination for #1 is the 2-13 focussing screen added to my OM4T.
> After pretty extensive looking through it in dim light with various
> lens, I'll be darned if I can tell much difference in the brightness
> or ease of focus. It does look prettier than the ground glass in my
> OM1N, that is, you do not see ground glass grain.
>
> My nomination for #2 is the Varimagni finder, and the 135mm focal length
lens.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Please control your addiction and the pleas for free equipment. :-)
>
> Winsor
> --
> Winsor Crosby
> Long Beach, California, USA
> mailto:wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz