From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [OM] What lens to carry (again)
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 20:40:37 -0500
I agree that the Superia X-tra 800 is a great film, for its speed, but
disagree that there is no difference between 100/400/800. All of my
negatives end up being scanned at 4000dpi and many are printed on my Epson
1270, often at 13x19. The 800 definately has a more noticeable grain to
it.
Not objectionable, just noticeable.
I'm pretty excited about trying the new Kodak Supra. It was evidently
designed specifcally to be scanned.
Tom
> Speaking as a former photojournalist - which continues to influence my
> shooting style - my idea of a truly light kit would be a single body,
the
> 35-70/3.5-4.5 Zuiko (which I don't own yet, but will), and some Fuji
Superia
> X-tra 800. A neutral density filter would take care of any too-bright
> conditions.
>[snip]
> The reason I'm a big fan of Fuji Superia X-tra 800 is that in prints up
to
> 8x10 there's hardly enough difference in visible grain compared with the
> slower films to warrant putting up with the hassles of having to lug a
> tripod or pass up some great shots. In 4x6 prints I simply cannot tell
any
> difference whatsoever between Fuji Superia 100, 200, 400 and 800 - I
have
to
> look at the negative margins. Superia X-tra also handles fluorescent
> lighting very well.
>
> Lex