Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Completed outfit, was ON THE WAY WAY OT...

Subject: Re: [OM] Completed outfit, was ON THE WAY WAY OT...
From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 11:27:23 +0800
I think you still need a 85/2 even you have a 90/2, as the 85/2 is
much lighter. When you want to travel light, you can pick the 85/2. 

C.H.Ling

John Prosper wrote:
> 
> >From: "Dave Bulger" <david_bulger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >I think I'm about down to "needing" a 90/2 for general macro use, an 85/2
> >for portraits, and a 180/2 for status.  But that's all.  Period.  I mean it
> >this time.  Really.
> 
> If you get a 90/2, you shouldn't need an 85/2.  The 90/2 may provide better
> bokeh, having 9 aperture blades to the 85's 8.  As for the 180/2, status is
> a very expensive mistress. ;-)
> 
> John A. Prosper
> _____________________________
> NET: japrosper@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz