From: "Dave Bulger" <david_bulger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Thomas Heide Clausen wrote:
> >...Even though I have been thinking really really hard,
> I have been unable to come up with anything OM-related that
> has to be "the
> next thing I cannot live without". Somehow, it seems that I have the
> OM-bodies and the lenses which are sufficient to satisfy my
> photographic
> needs...
>
I think I'm about down to "needing" a 90/2 for general macro use, an 85/2
for portraits, and a 180/2 for status. But that's all. Period. I mean it
this time. Really.
If you get a 90/2, you shouldn't need an 85/2. The 90/2 may provide better
bokeh, having 9 aperture blades to the 85's 8. As for the 180/2, status is
a very expensive mistress. ;-)
John A. Prosper
_____________________________
NET: japrosper@xxxxxxxxxxx
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|