Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM-4T vs. OM-4 as backup body

Subject: Re: [OM] OM-4T vs. OM-4 as backup body
From: "Craig H" <craigh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 21:53:02 -0400
Paul -- I agree.  My OM 4 is certainly a "high drain" version, at least as
indicated by the ma. tests.  Still, with pretty light use I get 6-8 mos. of
useful battery life -- not a problem for me.  BTW, my eBay name is the same
as my email address == craigh@xxxxxxxxxxx.

Craig

----- Original Message -----
From: <Pauls0627@xxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 8:37 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] OM-4T vs. OM-4 as backup body


> In a message dated 05/03/2000 7:40:45 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> > I disagree -- the OM-4 seems to get 1/4 the battery life of the OM-4T
> >  in any case, not just problem cases.
>
> Maybe I have an exceptionally good OM-4, but I got 14 months of light use
out
> of the last set of 357's I had in it. It doesn't have the OM-4Ti circuit,
as
> far as I know.
>
> Paul Schings
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz