Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM-4T vs. OM-4 as backup body

Subject: Re: [OM] OM-4T vs. OM-4 as backup body
From: Pauls0627@xxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 08:04:58 EDT
In a message dated 05/04/2000 1:25:31 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
kamm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:

> Is there any reason why we should not consider a mechanical body as a
>  backup?

Not at all. Whenever I pack more than 1 body, the second one is always an 
OM-1 or OM-1n. The first is usually the OM-4, sometimes the OM-2S.

Paul Schings

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz