I do wear glasses, so perhaps that is part of the problem. The 2S does seem
a lot easier to read. Maybe now that I've hit my 40's, I'm just more of a
mechanical needle kind of guy. I can see it coming, grandchild on my knee
(which will be awhile, since my oldest is 7). "I remember the days when
cameras had needles, and....something called film. You had to take it to a
camera store....and..."
But, Grandpa, what's film?....what's a store?...you had to leave the house
to get things?...you mean everything wasn't delivered by that nice man in
the brown clothes?
Tom
<snip>
> Yes, one might wish the display were more like the OM-2S in manual/spot
> mode, but doubtless there were some economies in matching the OM-4 display
> as much as possible. Do you wear glasses? My understanding is that it's
> more of a challenge in that case. I find the OM-4T display to be good in
> the sense that it is kind of a "bi-focal" view: you see the entire field
> of view when you look straight through the viewfinder; you have to look
> down a little when you want to be aware of the display. This works were
> for me, but I can see why it might be annoying for someone else.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|