ML Archiv: Re: [OM] OM2000

Subject:	Re: [OM] OM2000
From:	"Giles" <cnocbui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 11 May 1999 22:20:32 +0000

I was only pulling your leg.

Giles

c.e. packard wrote:

> Let me try explain the use of "they" - 
> It's sensible that gnomes would be good camera techs. Gnomes are very,
> very small and so are most camera parts.

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] OM2000, Robinsnes Re: [OM] OM2000, Denton Taylor Re: [OM] OM2000, c.e. packard Re: [OM] OM2000, Giles Re: [OM] OM2000, John Hermanson Re: [OM] OM2000, Barry B. Bean Re: [OM] OM2000, John Hermanson Re: [OM] OM2000, c.e. packard Re: [OM] OM2000, Giles <= Re: [OM] OM2000, c.e. packard Re: [OM] OM2000, John A. Lind Re: [OM] OM2000, Giles Re: [OM] OM2000, Steven_Read Re: [OM] OM2000, Arnab Kumar Banerjee Re: [OM] OM2000, Arnab Kumar Banerjee Re: [OM] OM2000, c.e. packard Re: [OM] OM2000, Christopher Biggs Re: [OM] OM2000, Wayne Harrison Re: [OM] OM2000, Jan Steinman

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] 100/2.8 or 85/2, Acer Victoria
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] 100/2.8 or 85/2, Giles
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] OM2000, c.e. packard
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] OM2000, c.e. packard
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]