Matt Haber wrote:
> I've watched the latest little bit of enviro bashing and counter
> bashing with some amusement and some annoyance.
>
> It seems like some of us (no names!) lose our civility when it comes
> to discussions of the environment and the human impact on it. That
> and the fact that they (especially the most recent) are WAY off topic
> (ie OM content at or near zero) suggest they really shouldn't be
> happening, AT ALL on this list.
>
> George <gma> is not going to convince me to stop hugging trees, and
> I'm not going to convince him to stop driving his humvee all over
> them. Even if that were going to happen, this list isn't the place
> for it. I'd much rather find out about george's latest OM find (then
> I can argue in person! <grin>).
>
> Can we all agree to keep this kind of discussion off the list? I
> would say this applies to your opinion of political leaders (whether
> of the US, Japan, Peru, Zimbabwe, etc) and other volatile off OM
> topics in general.
>
> ok?
OK, OK. But matt, believe me, as long as you're hugging a tree, you're
safe from me and my Tahoe. I actually belong to several conservation
groups, no kidding. Don't think that because I have no use for political
correctness that I don't treasure the planet.
george
>
>
> matt
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|