Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: FW: [OM] Now I remember why...

Subject: Re: FW: [OM] Now I remember why...
From: George Sears <gwsears@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 12:22:30 -0400
At 11:04 AM 5/22/98 -0400, you wrote:
>Lars,
>
>I get so frustrated when I get a roll back and there are
>some that are out of focus or any other of the millions of
>problems that occur.  I want that perfect roll where they all
>turn out great - how often does that actually occur?  Do
>professionals get it right every time?  If not, what percentage
>of the time is reasonable to expect prints that are wrong (i.e.
>3 pictures out of a roll of 24)?
>
>I'm not talking about things like, the subject moved at the last
>minute or Eyes closed.  I'm referring to out of focus or blurry or
>any one of those "operator errors"!
>
>Thanks,
>
>Kris
>

I refer to my out of focus and blurry shots as those with "bokeh". Makes me
feel better about about my screwed up shots. To you, they would look out of
focus and blurry but to me, they gots the good "bokeh".

There, did i get it right?  "Bokeh" is in the eye of the beholder.

george2

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz