> Dunno the 2000, but the 77 and 88 do support T-flashes (both have TTL-OTF
> flash exposure). The vertical shutter allows a 1/125 synchro x time and
the
> 77 allows super FP mode too with a double GN than the 0M-4T. ASFAIK none
of
> the majors permit compatibility of screens, winders etc. from MF to AF
> models (that is: N, C, M, P, Y, etc.).
The OM 77 sync at 1/100 and the OM88 only sync at 1/80, while the OM2000 do
sync at 1/125 (the highest of all OMs). The OM2000 is a mechanical shutter
camera so it is better compare with the OM-1. The only thing I don't like
is it does not compatible with motor drive. (of course, also the top and
bottom plastic, but at this price range you cannot expect too much.)
For the GN at super FP mode, the OM-707 only get 20 0gher. Below is part
of the figures I copy from an OM catalogue dated April 89:
Shutter OM-707 OM-4T
1/2000 10.2 8.5
1/500 20.3 17
1/125 40.7 34.1
C.H.Ling
>
> As for rugged, once I drop an 88 (while I was holding two oms plus three
> zuikos on two hands only, and shooting on the same time) and I have to
say
> that the body didn't say "ah". A classic 0M-1 or 0M-2 body would have
> resulted "bumped" more or less, with the same test (that I will not try).
>
> Marco
> mailto:tom@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|