[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] How does it look?

Subject: Re: [OM] How does it look?
From: Wayne Shumaker <om3ti@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2024 18:02:43 -0700
At 1/31/2024 10:49 PM, Filtered Moose wrote:

>On 1/28/2024 10:25 AM, usher99--- via olympus wrote:
>>They all have their positive attributes but the TTartisans is most "organic" 
>>with enough sharpness to work and the modified bokeh one is my first choice. 
>>Â I reluctantly say that as you de-bubblefied it and bubbles are the bokeh 
>>hallmark of that lens.
>Indeed, but it's also an optically simple lens with less hard edged rendering 
>than many contemporary lenses.
>>The reworked 12-200 rendition is sharper but less artistic IMO. The soft 
>>filter is a bit too soft for me but does work and might be a nice print.
>Using tripod and same lens, only changing filter, opens the possibilities for 
>overlaying and adjusting opacity. There are also filter options. To lower the 
>amount of madness, I've limited myself for the moment. However, I have 
>stronger and weaker filters, Nikon Soft 2 and Fotodiox Diffuser.
>BTW, in my lengthy reply to Wayne, I hadn't found this simple example of 
>filter and DoF. 
>Filtered Moose

Using the filter for softening softens uniformly. Whereas spherical aberration 
varies with focal point, as bokeh does. So, I'm not liking the filter effect as 
there is no depth to it.


Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz