[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM-1 and 100-400 mm lenses

Subject: Re: [OM] OM-1 and 100-400 mm lenses
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 01:38:03 -0700
On 7/5/2022 3:43 PM, Mike Gordon via olympus wrote:
<<<The middle speed, using electronic shutter and focusing and/or setting 
exposure for each frame, IS available for the PL 100-400!

A most interesting  post in many ways.  You already have both and thus a 
different calculus involved.  ProC with focusing on the PL is a definite 
unexpected plus.
That leaves the TC deficit

Not enough turbid chai?
Insufficient space in the time capsule?
Inadequate turbo charger?
No true crime?

I may be a little punchy . . .  "TC" is not connecting. Obvious, I'm sure, but 
not in my head at this moment.

and the sharpness differences partially offset by the size/weight advantage of 
the PL.

A single test of both lenses at about 300mm with the Pentax T132 at about 1:1 
would be most interesting.

I can't see 1:1 as a good choice for testing. What do we shoot that's about half an inch tall, and fills the frame? I'm thinking more like 1:3, maybe 1:4. Or are you thinking in FF terms? 1:2 FF is 1:4, 4/3.

How much of the frame did your Little Wood-satyr fill? "The *Little* *Wood-satyr* is typically 1.1 inches to 1.8 inches (29mm to 48mm) in size."

True Chaos Moose

What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz