| Subject: | Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) shaper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic. |
|---|---|
| From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 11 May 2021 22:06:17 -0800 |
> More likely eccentric, offbeat, outlandish... "Outlandish!" I love it. Yes, I have some pretty outlandish outfits. I certainly don't want to be identified as eccentric. Offbeat is probably OK but outlandish is good! Quirky is definitely accurate. But it does depend on who I'm going out on a date with. Some times I'm more quirky than other times. AG/DG Schnozz -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) shaper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., Wayne Shumaker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] IMG: some new film portraits, Nathan Wajsman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) shaper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., Wayne Shumaker |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] New Year's Bud - Aftermath, Mike Gordon via olympus |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |