At 9/9/2020 04:38 PM, Mike wrote:
>> Obviously you have not yet read the latest in science:
><<I'll stick with Einstein on this one.
>Interesting articles but overinterpreted by the press as usual. Quantum
>mechanics is weird enough w/o overinterpretation. The "measurement problem"
>in QM really hasn't been resolved. Wave fxn's collapse when measured and
>wave/particle duality of particles do as well--see the recent incarnation of
>that effect from the Weitzman Institute:
>So the more efficient the detector of electrons the less interference pattern
>there is and the more the electrons behave as particles. Don't watch--wave;
>This new experiment interpreted as no objective reality exists is like a
>fancy Wigner's friend paradox. It really just confirms Bell's inequality and
>c/w known QM. The "measurers" are really photons assessing polarization and
>not a macroscopic device controlled by consciousness. To call them Bob and
>Alice is misleading. What I really want to know is why such experiments are
>always run by Bob and Alice and not Poindexter and Cassandra?
Posted in jest.
Bob and Alice is used in Cryptography as well. Probably originated with the
film "Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice." - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_and_Bob
I think the E-1 in Ken's hands, when he pushes the button, gives different
colors than if I pushed the same button. His eyes and mind pull in all those
color photons into the camera. We are drawn to the camera that best fits our
Sunyata - WayneS
You know the nearer your destination
The more you're slip slidin' away
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/