It is heavy, Chris, I must admit. But, I'm primarily using it with a
monopod. I'm looking forward to butterfly season, to see how it works
out for those shots.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
On 3/17/2019 6:49 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
That’s great, Jim. I remember being very happy with the lens, although having
to carry it was something to think about.
Chris
On 15 Mar 2019, at 16:14, Jim Nichols <jhnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks, Tina.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
On 3/15/2019 10:43 AM, Tina Manley wrote:
I think you are going to have fun with that lens. As long as you have
plenty of light, it looks great!
Tina
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 4:51 PM Jim Nichols <jhnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Frank, I think it was me, not the lens. The differences you noted in
the second paragraph were due to weather. Clouds have been around all
day today.
I got this grab shot at the bird bath later today, tilting the camera up
against the window to capture the edge of the bird bath. It came out fine.
http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/20190314-P3147889.JPG.html
I think I just need more experience with the gear. I'm not, at least at
this time, sending it back.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
On 3/14/2019 3:18 PM, Frank wrote:
Hmm... the SWD picture is unsharp and/or shaken, I don't think you can
conclude anything from that picture. Except that the lens is a lemon if
you
can't get it any better.
I noticed 1/100 for the SWD version and 1/320 & 1/500 for Takumar
versions
though (which I like btw). Could that explain the difference?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
