Hmm... the SWD picture is unsharp and/or shaken, I don't think you can
conclude anything from that picture. Except that the lens is a lemon if you
can't get it any better.
I noticed 1/100 for the SWD version and 1/320 & 1/500 for Takumar versions
though (which I like btw). Could that explain the difference?
Op do 14 mrt. 2019 om 17:37 schreef Jim Nichols <jhnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> I've been using a Pentax Takumar 200mm for a couple of weeks, and
> decided that 200mm Autofocus would be handy, so I ordered a used Olympus
> 50-200 SWD lens, which arrived this morning from KEH. With a new feeder
> and my tripod set behind clean window glass, I was watching the birds
> checking out the feeder. This Downy Woodpecker was caught with the
> Takumar and manual focus.
>
> http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/20190313-P3137837.JPG.html
>
> The 50-200 arrived at my door, so I mounted it in the same spot and,
> using Autofocus, caught this group at the breakfast bar.
>
> http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/20190314-P3147844.JPG.html
>
> I have to get a lot more experience with the new lens, but this
> comparison did show me that the old Takumar is not too bad in its own
> right.
>
> --
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
