Re: [OM] Damn, I'm excited!

[WayneS]

The Sony 70-300/4.5-5.6 is not that much heavier than the 24-105. What I like 
is the close focus on it means a macro lens is not required for most of the 
things I would use macro for. Someday I will learn how to take photos and share 
something.

WayneS

At 7/9/2018 11:51 AM, you wrote:
>> Besides the 400/2.8 beast, do you have eyes on anything else? or just using 
>> the Zuiko glass. Let us know of your experience with it.
>
>The resident photographer/artist here at Chugach State Park has this
>big honkin Nikon 200-400 F-something. The lens hood is longer than any
>of my lenses. Simply mammoth. It dwarfed the D5 it was attached to.
>Granted, this is his business and he gets some incredible shots, but
>good grief, man. You need a pack mule.
>
>I'll gladly keep shooting away with the OM Zuiko 300/4.5 for as long
>as I can, recognizing that it isn't for every purpose, but I can pick
>and choose my purposes.
>
>AG Schnozz
>-- 
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/