Does anyone have experience of the Pany/Leica 25mm 1.4? Is it worth the extra
cost over the 1.7?
Mike
Seratel Ltd.
Computer Systems for
Electronics Manufacturers
Mulrany, Westport,
Co. Mayo, Ireland.
www.seratel.ie
www.ReelaMounts.com
Telephone: + 353 98 36244
Fax: +353 98 36024
> On 17 Jan 2018, at 06:55, Philippe <photo.philippe.amard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Exactly my experience - apart from the fun of using legacy lenses, I have
> found most current lenses better corrected, sharper, consistent with the new
> systems, whatever the brand.
>
> There are some exceptions of course, but I wouldn’t want to go through the
> ordeal of adapters, manual focussing, wrong light-metering, weight, purple or
> any colour fringing, distortion, again. No way.
>
> Why not think of cameras as systems that include the lenses that have been
> carefully designed to match ?
>
> Amities
> Philippe
>
>
>> Le 17 janv. 2018 à 07:11, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>>
>> What are you looking for? I assume by "better choice", you mean higher
>> resolution, better corners, etc? For that, it's mostly the later the better.
>> I doubt if any of the above will match, let alone exceed, the resolution and
>> contrast of any native µ4/3 AF lens of similar FL.
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|