Hi, Moose -
I didn't get your improved file. How did you do that? It's a subtle
difference, but I can see it.
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10/28/2017 7:54 AM, Tina Manley wrote:
>> I had an e-mail from Moose about the focusing on this photo:
>> I can't find the e-mail now but I wanted to explain. I did have the SL on
>> face recognition and it does focus on the eyes; however, that photo is an
>> extreme crop of this one:
>> The focus is on the eyes of the boy standing next to her (I cropped and
>> printed him, too), but I loved her expression
> Glad to know that neither your SL nor eyes failed you!
> and thought the focus was good enough for notecards and/or postcards. I
>> won't be printing a 2'x3'
>> canvas of her.
> I didn't make that connection. You asked/said "Isn't this a beautiful
> girl? . . . She looks like Mona Lisa to me."
> I answered, in effect, "Sure, but doesn't she deserve a better portrait?"
> and illustrated that such was still possible. <
> As to sharp enough for a notecard, sure - but I might still see the
> difference, I can't unsee what my 20/10 vision sees. I can often see
> whether small prints are from sharp originals.
> Why not do the best possible?
> Clarification Moose
> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/