Just for your information, the original quote by HCB didn't address sharpness
as such, but rather non-blur for all I know.
Also implied are correctly focussed, clarity, non fuzziness, etc.
For instance, a photo that is NOT "nette" primarily suffers from motion blur,
poor focusing or contrast, camera shake, flare, name it … not necessarily from
a lack of lines/definiton, usw.
That's how any native-speaker would get his sentence anyhow.
For more on the idea
http://www.linguee.fr/francais-anglais/search?source=auto&query=netteté;
Amities
Philippe
Le 16 déc. 2016 à 08:16, Frank <wijsmuller@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> Corner "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept" ;-)
>
>
> 2016-12-16 2:15 GMT+01:00 Mike Gordon
>
>>
>> I'll leave the fine wine tasting on which Zuiko's are best on digital to
>> Ken ;-).
>>
>>
>> <<<<His take so far has been that it's different for different
>> sensor/bodies.
>>
>>
>> May definitely vary even with the OM A7 bodies especially with the WA
>> Zuikos. The corner detail/color smearing is especially prominent with RF
>> WA lenses with short exit pupil distances to the sensor but still occurs
>> with some WA film lenses.
>>
>> The OM A7RII has less of an issue with its BSI design but still has a few
>> issues with pixel peepers with the C/Y 35-70 and probably WA Zuikos but I
>> am not 100% sure of the latter. I have never seen a table of Zuiko exit
>> pupil distances.
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|