Well, shoot, there was supposed to be a table in there. I suppose the list
server rejected it.
On 7/13/2014 4:02 PM, Moose wrote:
On 7/13/2014 2:25 PM, Tina Manley wrote:
...
In percentages, the Fuji was close to the M240, essentially the same % of original shots ended up with 4 stars, and it
was better in % to in-focus shots.
Total OOF % Net 4 Star % to Total % to Net
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fuji 869 243 28% 626 33 3.8% 5.3%
M240 549 23 4% 526 22 4.0% 4.2%
MM 411 14 3% 397 48 11.7% 12.1%
Number Less Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|