It just goes to show that output sharpening is a function of display
size and resolution. One size does not fit all.
Chuck Norcutt
On 7/8/2014 2:06 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
Interestingly, Mike, that looked over-sharpened on my little MacBook Air’s screen
first thing this morning, but it looks much better this evening on my large iMac’s
screen.
Nice one.
Chris
On 8 Jul 2014, at 00:12, Mike Gordon via olympus <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
About a week ago went to my first outing at Horn Pond "Mtn" ( perhaps 300 feet)
which is a usual hangout for Hairstreaks. We saw less than half a dozen (fewest in
memory, but must just have been the day) and only a couple chances at any images. I had a
friend watching a field in North Andover for the ememrgence of the Baltimore
Checkerspots, and after a few hours at Horn Pond drove about 40 minutes for a chance at a
nice image of a Baltimore. They can be stunning when newly emerged, nectaring on a color
coordinated blossum. They were in abundance but had trouble getting one isolated with a
nice background and did not succeed.. I had one more chance on Saturday as there were a
few on the annual 4th of July Count at Appleton farm. I am still working on any usable
images. (Moose has been there) I am convinced that a touch of T32 as fill flash is
helpful in some circumstances in bring out out the colors/iridescence.
Here are a few from Horn Pond--probably just hit slide show for sizing if so
inclined --the sharpening seems to scale ok with the gallery settings.
http://tinyurl.com/osj6aah
Chase but only rarely catch, Mike
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|