| Subject: | Re: [OM] OT: Sony Sucks, big time |
|---|---|
| From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Apr 2014 07:40:57 +1000 |
? Am I wrong here but… I was of the understanding that Betamax was the better system - more compact, more reliable, less prone to jamming - but VCR reached the tipping point first in the consumer market and dominated. Isn't that why the professional and ENG market kept using very expensive Betamax equipment for a very long time - until digital got good enough? I suspect that we did ourselves a disservice there. And isn't Apple still winning? Andrew Fildes afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx On 14/04/2014, at 1:41 AM, Paul Laughlin wrote: > I decided that, way back with the Sony Betamax. LOL I dislike Apple for > the very same reason. > Paul in Portland OR > > On 4/13/2014 1:44 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote: > Everything Sony seems to be proprietary. > > -- > _________________________________________________________________ > Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus > Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ > Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OT: Sony Sucks, big time, Andrew Fildes |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] (no subject), Piers Hemy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OT: Sony Sucks, big time, Ken Norton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OT: Sony Sucks, big time, Moose |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |