On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 3:36 PM, JOHN DUGGAN
<john.duggan10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Moose wrote thus
>
> "Oly has an answer to that, the 60/2.8 macro lens - which is why I'll not
> be answering my own question above. It's a
> truly excellent macro lens with better working distance than the 12-50
> with tubes. Focuses directly to what would be 2:1
> (2x) on FF........
> Exactly why I sometimes use the 65-300 with extension tubes. No crawling
> on one's belly and the great working distance
> tends to scare the subjects less. Less often, though, now that I have the
> 60/2.8."
>
> Macro Moose.
>
> I recently bought the 60mm f2.8 macro lens and it truly follows in the
> footsteps of the Olympus macro lenses of the past. It continues to surprise
> with the quality of results it produces.Highly recommended.
>
So should I dump my DZ 50/2 in anticipation of taking home a E-M1 +DZ
adapter?
Joel W.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|