| Subject: | Re: [OM] E-M5 EVF delay, again |
|---|---|
| From: | "Sawyer, Edward" <Ed.Sawyer@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:40:26 +0000 |
I wouldn't draw that conclusion, just too many variables at play here. I will say the Eos 1V feels instantaneously fast as far as shutter lag. Esp. on the high-speed-drive mode. (10fps). On 2/16/14 3:43 PM, "olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Very interesting, Ed. Peter's measurements >------------------------------------------------ >EVF on "standard" frame rate (120 fps): 394 ms >EVF on "Fast" frame rate (240 fps): 266 ms >Bare-eyed: 238 ms >----------------------------------------------- >show that the delay imposed by the EVF with the fast frame rate is only >28 ms. That's faster than the EOS 1v's time to open the mirror. Can we >say that the response time of the E-M5 (without shutter shock enabled) >is actually faster than an SLR? I'm sure some here wouldn't want to >admit that but I think the data says so. And, as I posted here earlier, >I don't think it makes any sense to leave shutter shock delay enabled >for sports photography where both camera and subject are moving fast and >resolution will necessarily be significantly reduced by motion blur. -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Dancing, Paul Braun |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] E-M5 EVF delay, again, Chuck Norcutt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-M5 EVF delay, again, Chuck Norcutt |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-M5 EVF delay, again, Chuck Norcutt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |