[OM] Sony A7 mirrorless FF body announced

[usher99]

Adapted Moose writes:

>>Could it be a factor in 80/4 macro on adapter vs. 60/2.8 native µ4/3 
macro lens
>>test? That the 80/4 Auto covers a much
>>larger field might mean no problem if adapter is close to perfect.

Suspect will have to wait Until the Moose gets home for publication of 
the S. Hamilton branch of O.K. Corral shoot off.

Could be a factor indeed but also the 80/4 uses pure extension to get 
to 1:1 so shooting at same effective aperture isn't necessarily easy. 
The LCD was much noisier with the 80/4 perhaps in part due to the more 
light lost.
Still the 60/2.8 would be almost impossible to match and even looked 
better on the cam w/o pixel peeping.

Not quite surrendering yet, Mike








-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/