Re: [OM] Any 24mm f3.5 Shift lenses available?

[Sawyer, Edward]

I have seen the 24/3.5 sell for < $1000 several times. I had a hard time
getting a good price for mine when I sold them. It took a while.

Haven't compared to the SA 28mm, no.   I think the OM would be better, as
it likely has more shift (12 or 13mm I think?) plus of course it's wider,
which is crucial.  And it's easily adapted to various other 35mm bodies if
need be. (canon, Nikon, etc.)

On 7/17/13 6:16 AM, "olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Re: [OM] Any 24mm f3.5 Shift lenses available?
>To: Olympus Camera Discussion <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP13834489F7A34E098569AD8C600@xxxxxxx>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
>
>Hard to find a $900 24/3.5.
>Easy to find a $1100 to $1500 unit though.
>
>So, can you compare and contrast the 24/3.5 to the PC Super Angulon 28mm
>f3.5 Leica R lens ?
>Am I silly to pursue the OM 24/3.5 if I already have the Leica R lens?
>Or is the GAS demon on my shoulder just "having a go" at my (and my
>pocketbook)?
>
>Vick

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/