Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] IMG: Harvest

Subject: Re: [OM] IMG: Harvest
From: Bob Whitmire <bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 07:22:01 -0400
I could be wrong, but I believe my Epson 3880 prints 16-bit Adobe. I know 
there's a check box for 16 bit in the printer driver.

--Bob Whitmire
Registered Neanderthal

On Jun 8, 2013, at 10:41 PM, Moose wrote:

> On 6/6/2013 3:35 PM, C.H.Ling wrote:
>> sRGB is the final output to most monitors and printers, any other standards
>> have to convert once again. I know Tina's files are sRGB, I just want to
>> avoid any problem that could happen.
> 
> I believe/hope that her scans are 16 bit and at least aRGB, as she is doing 
> some extreme color editing on some of them. 
> With the proper conversion settings in PS, it will convert to 8 bit and sRGB 
> for the web without losing any bits, only 
> pulling them into the target color space. Better to do this at the end. Doing 
> it in the scan has the same possibilities 
> of loss, and limits what may be done in post.
> 
>> Putting non sRGB file on the web is something I will never do, some browsers
>> (and the older versions) still don't know the conversion. I doubt what will
>> happen to your 8 bit aRGB or Prophoto RGB web image when it is converted by
>> the browser and dispaly on your monitor. Will the re-mapping causing bit
>> lost?
> 
> This used to be a problem. I had particular trouble with some bright oranges. 
> They looked good in Safari, which was 
> color profile aware, but I couldn't get them to look right in IE or Firefox, 
> whether posted in sRGB or aRGB.
> 
> For some years now, all the major browsers have recognized and properly 
> display aRGB.

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz