They first came to notice for the quality of their high ISO images - but were
oh so frustratingly slow. I believe that they've fixed that now.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.soultheft.com
Author/Publisher: The SLR Compendium - http://www.blurb.com/books/3732813
On 09/06/2013, at 4:13 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
> That's a shame, Nathan. Fuji cameras now have a good reputation for the
> quality of their jpeg output. I shoot RAW and jpg now, using the X100S's jpg
> for what I shot, e.g. monochrome, but with the RAW as a colour backup if I
> want to fiddle around.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|