Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 22: testing / the X-Pro 1 lands in Alicante

Subject: Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 22: testing / the X-Pro 1 lands in Alicante
From: Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2013 19:13:24 +0100
That's a shame, Nathan.  Fuji cameras now have a good reputation for the 
quality of their jpeg output.  I shoot RAW and jpg now, using the X100S's jpg 
for what I shot, e.g. monochrome, but with the RAW as a colour backup if I want 
to fiddle around.

And, given your predilection for avoiding post-processing, I should have 
thought that jpg output would be your forte.

Chris

On 5 Jun 2013, at 05:28, Nathan Wajsman <photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> What is the in-cam jpeg engine and is it relevant for someone who shoots only 
> Raw? No camera of mine is ever sullied with jpeg.

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz