Thanks Bob. I would love to delve into some printing like that. Do you
know of a decent fine art paper that works with dyes, preferably some sort
of Epson paper? That's probably a tall order, plus Epson only provides
profiles it approves of, and not many of those.
Joel W.
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Bob Whitmire <bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> I'm not a huge fan of flowers, but these have a distinctive painterly
> quality to them. I can easily visualize some of them printed on expensive
> fine art paper and confusing hell out of gallery goers. (Which is not, all
> in all, a bad thing. <g>)
>
> --Bob
>
>
> On Mar 11, 2013, at 8:20 AM, DZDub wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Chris and Philippe, for looking further than required, and for
> the
> > kind remarks.
> >
> > Philippe, the lens is my Zuiko 90/2, which is prized for he qualities you
> > note. I have other close-focusing lenses that beat it for sharpness, but
> > all of qualties of the 90/2 en toto often produce a pleasant result.
> This
> > is true whether mounted on an E camera or on the 5D. Somehow I prefer it
> > without the crop factor.
> >
> > I had not yet switched to any version of Photoshop more recent that 8.0
> > (the original CS) until last summer, so these were processed with that.
> > Fairly minimal processing -- just levels, a bit of saturation maybe, a
> > curve or two, and sharpening. That old version of PS seems like a
> hatchet
> > compared to PS6!
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|