On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2/4/2013 9:03 PM, DZDub wrote:
> > ...
> > Still, I've been there before, and will be again, and I'm quite happy
> with
> > the single exposure I took that day.
> > <http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=2059>
> >
> > This one is quite a bit nicer at full size, though a number of the
> branches
> > look jaggy in a digital rather than a natural way. Is it just my
> equipment
> > (or my imagination)?
>
> Aaaargh! Sometimes I despair of showing fine detail in nature on the web.
> That one snag, in particular, seems to be at
> just the right angle and thinness to cause trouble. Sloppy eyes let it get
> by.
>
> I've posted a 2048 wide version now. It's better full size than before,
> although about the same at 900.
>
> Exasperated Moose
>
Cheer up. Looks good. :)
Joel W.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|