ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Eeeek!

Subject:	Re: [OM] Eeeek!
From:	Mike Lazzari <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 04 Aug 2012 15:31:26 -0700

> I eschew that last stop. F32 goes into fluffy soft city. Been there, done the 
> tests.
Yes, f22 works

> You mean in addition to bragging rights, and implied physical superiorities?
I was thinking of the increased DR of the newer models. Not necessarily 
a function of the pixel count though.

Mike

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Eeeek!, (continued) Re: [OM] Eeeek!, Joel Wilcox Re: [OM] Eeeek!, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Eeeek!, Joel Wilcox Re: [OM] Eeeek!, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Eeeek!, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Eeeek!, Jim Nichols Re: [OM] Eeeek!, Mike Lazzari Re: [OM] Eeeek!, Moose Re: [OM] Eeeek!, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Eeeek!, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Eeeek!, Mike Lazzari <= Re: [OM] Eeeek!, Carlos J. Santisteban [OM] Mea Culpa? [was Eeeek!], Moose Re: [OM] Mea Culpa? [was Eeeek!], Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Mea Culpa? [was Eeeek!], Moose Re: [OM] Mea Culpa? [was Eeeek!], Ken Norton Re: [OM] Mea Culpa? [was Eeeek!], Frank Wijsmuller Re: [OM] Mea Culpa? [was Eeeek!], Moose

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] IMG: Skipper on Cosmos, Tina Manley
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] IMG: Tour de Jylland, Mike Lazzari
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Eeeek!, Ken Norton
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Eeeek!, Carlos J. Santisteban
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]