Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Eeeek!

Subject: Re: [OM] Eeeek!
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 15:46:51 -0700
On 8/3/2012 10:13 AM, Mike Lazzari wrote:
>>    I often had less DOF than I would have liked....
> As far as the physics, been there. (yawn, eyes glazed over)

Yeah, but I remembered long enough to solve the problem on the physics test. :-)

> I believe this link was previously posted:
> <http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/resolution.shtml>
>
>   From a practical perspective who cares if you have the full 10mp or
> whatever data of an OOF photo? I happily crank down the ring on my
> 135/4.5 macro and don't look back.

I eschew that last stop. F32 goes into fluffy soft city. Been there, done the 
tests.

> The higher sensor pixel count has other benefits than pure resolution.

You mean in addition to bragging rights, and implied physical superiorities?

T. I. C. Moose

-- 
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz