Ah, I like the trees and clouds with the moon.
Chuck Norcutt
On 7/1/2012 11:38 PM, Moose wrote:
> On 7/1/2012 12:01 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
>> Nice one , Moose.
>
> Thanks, Chris.
>
> I'm not entirely sure why I took those moon shots. It seems somewhat of a
> mug's game to do so with modest equipment.
> Quality is always limited by air movement, and there are endless better
> versions available form NASA and such. I suppose
> part of the reason was simply the endless mediocre shots posted all over the
> web. A sort of challenge.
>
> But really, they are repetitive and rather dull. I much prefer other ways of
> "shooting the moon".
>
> Illuminating interesting clouds.
> <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=IATMS&image=_MG_8686ia.jpg>
>
> With trees and clouds.
> <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=IATMS&image=DSCF1583nix2.jpg>
>
> The ring around the Moon, with planet.
> <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=IATMS&image=_MG_8687ia.jpg>
>
> All taken within 32 hours; first and last 22 min to midnight and 2 hrs 40
> min. later.
>
> Loony Moose
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
