Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] What's all this about Deconvolution? [was Happy ... ]

Subject: Re: [OM] What's all this about Deconvolution? [was Happy ... ]
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 21:05:34 -0400
Yes, now that I'm actually starting to use FM I also find the lack of a 
64 bit version somewhat worrying.  I've been thinking long and hard 
about moving to 64 bits.

Chuck Norcutt



On 4/11/2012 6:12 PM, Moose wrote:
> On 4/11/2012 2:02 PM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
>> ... The Canyon L 24-105 f4 IS was just too attractive as the "kit" lens 
>> given the discount combined with cam. The long
>> end wide open (>80mm, IMO) really isn't that great in the corners.
>
> Not your opinion alone, quite common.
>
>> I bet the DLO will help.
>
> So what's up with deconvolution? Canon DLO may or may not be great, but 
> unless somebody 'cracks' the data format, won't
> work for my most used lenses.
>
> I just tried DXO again, latest free trial version. They claim to work with 
> the Tammy 28-300 VC, but the actual results
> are just useless. I can do better with USM and FM is WAY better.
>
> As you have noted, FM's site has said for years that they'll get around to a 
> 64 bit version. I don't think that's
> anything more than a recompile. FM is a regular part of my work flow, doing 
> both capture sharpening and post sizing
> sharpening for the web better than USM or any of the tools that use it 
> underneath. It really seems like the S100 and FM,
> radius 2, were made for each other; just amazing.
>
> Now that I'm seriously looking at a new, 64 bit machine for image processing, 
> this is becoming important to me.
>
> With V2, it appears that FocusFixer added a deconvolution based process, 
> although they don't use the word. But they've
> added basically nothing to their site since 2008, so their promise of 64 bit 
> sounds as hollow as FM's. Sounds like both
> developers have moved on to other things and are just letting the old 
> projects generate what income they can, without
> any further development.
>
> Haven't tried CS6 yet, but from the demos, it appears their blur fix is 
> strictly for motion.
>
> BiQ sounds capable, but actually using it looks painful and time killing.
>
> What's a 64 bit boy to do?
>
> Convoluted Moose
>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz