On 4/9/2012 4:56 AM, Joel Wilcox wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2012, at 09:09 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> I rather like 381. 430 isn't too shabby either. However, you do need
>> to pay attention to those sensor dust bunnies. That ain't no Olympus.
>> The 5D has pretty poor personal hygiene when it comes to sensor dust.
> Now you're getting personal!
>
> BTW I know exactly where the sensor crud is and what it's doing. Have to
> spot almost every photo, and do, so if you think you're seeing sensor
> dust traces -- not likely.
Isn't there a function in some conversion/editing software to automate that
process for groups of images with the same
dust spots?
Certainly in PS, one could start recording an Action, spot one image, save the
Action and run it on subsequent images.
On 4/9/2012 8:20 AM, Joel Wilcox wrote:
> ... I thought I would find it really annoying to spot digital images, but as
> I am almost totally using film lenses with the body and I always had to go
> looking for dust spots in film scans, it seems completely natural to me.
Then again, if it's like Zen, Chop Wood, Carry Water, Spot Images, feel free to
ignore my suggestions. ;-)
Hummm. Did I just remember that the 60D has a dust mapping and removal feature?
Oh well, haven't needed it as yet, if it
does exist.
Dust Free Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|