Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] (OM) A little diversioon - on topic for a change

Subject: Re: [OM] (OM) A little diversioon - on topic for a change
From: "Jim Nichols" <jhnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 22:10:40 -0600
Thanks, Moose.  I must confess my ignorance of OM lenses prior to the ZD 
series.

That looks like a setup with a lot of flexibility.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 9:16 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] (OM) A little diversioon - on topic for a change


> On 3/1/2012 5:41 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
>> Those images look very good, Brian.  I see it is a 135mm.  One of the
>> sharpest older lenses that I have is a Pentax Takumar 135, which works 
>> fine
>> on my E-1.  The only downside is that it only focuses down to around 4-5
>> feet.  I note that you refer to yours as a macro, so perhaps you will not
>> encounter this problem.
>
> I believe Brian is referring to the 135/4.5 bellows lens. This is a true 
> macro lens that requires either a bellows, the
> 65-116 Auto-Tube or various extension tubes to mount on the camera. It has 
> only a short focusing helicoid for fine
> adjustment. <http://omesif.moosemystic.net/om-sif/lensgroup/135mmf45.htm>
>
> Macro Moose
>
> -- 
> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
> 


-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz